La buona novella: Difference between revisions

{{Quote|I wrote "'''La buona novella'''" back in 1969. It was a time when there were student protests, and those who were less attentive - that is to say, the majority - companions, friends, peers, considered that album as anachronistic. They would say to me: "How is it that we are protesting the abuse of power in and around the universities, and you come along telling a story - which among other things we already know - from the preaching of Jesus Christ." They hadn't understood that in reality La Buona Novella was intended to be an allegory - was an allegory - of the comparison between the better and more sane elements of the sixty-eighters, and those other elements that were perhaps more spiritually elevated but from an ethical and social point of view were very similar, that were advocated by this man who 1969 years before against abuses of power, against abuses of authority, in the name of egalitarianism and universal brotherhood. His name was Jesus of Nazareth, and according to me he was and is the greatest revolutionary of all times. I didn't want to explore paths such as metaphysics or theology, which are quite arduous for my tastes, and of which I know little; and yet I have always thought that if God didn't exist we would have to invent Him<ref>This is a typical Italian expression, when something is found to be ingenious.</ref>. Which is precisely what man did when he set his foot on earth. I took inspiration from the so called apocryphal evangelists. Apocryphal means false, and they were in fact men that existed in flesh and bones. The Church, at least until a few centuries ago, frowned upon those who were not christians and who yet wanted to talk about Jeus. We're talking about writers, historians, Arabs, Armenians, Byzantines, Greeks, who when they touched upon the issue, when they spoke about Jesus of Nazareth, did so with deference, with great respect. Even today Muslims continue to consider Jesus of Nazareth as the greatest prophet who ever existed, even before Abraham, although second to Mohammed. Whereas Catholics continue to consider Mohammed less than a scoundrel. And I would say that this a score for Islam. Don't get me wrong, here we're talking about serious Islam.|Fabrizio de André|Concert in the Brancaccio Theatre ''(February 14th 1998)''}}