Difference between revisions of "Semina Verbi:Peer review"

From Seeds of the Word
(Created page with "<!-- {{notice|heading=Student editors: Please DO NOT submit peer review requests here. | This forum cannot function when dozens or hundreds of peer review requests are added a...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
{{redirect|WP:PR|the Public Relations FAQ|Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|patrolled revisions|Wikipedia:Patrolled revisions|the guideline on the use of press releases|Wikipedia:Third-party sources#Press releases}}
{{redirect|WP:PR|the Public Relations FAQ|Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|patrolled revisions|Wikipedia:Patrolled revisions|the guideline on the use of press releases|Wikipedia:Third-party sources#Press releases}}
{{For|the Wikipedia guideline about pending changes|Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes}}{{for|the review of new pages|Wikipedia:New pages patrol}}
{{For|the Wikipedia guideline about pending changes|Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes}}{{for|the review of new pages|Wikipedia:New pages patrol}}
{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Tab header}}
{{Semina_Verbi:Peer review/Tab header}}
{{shortcut|WP:PR}}
{{shortcut|WP:PR}}
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 02:37, September 4, 2020

MainUnansweredInstructionsDiscussionToolsArchiveProject
PR icon.png

Wikipedia's peer review process is a way to receive feedback from other editors about an article. An article may be nominated by any editor, and will appear on the list of all peer reviews. Other editors can comment on the review. Peer review may be used to establish an article's suitability as a good article nomination or featured article candidate. Peer review is a useful place to centralise reviews from many editors (for example, from those associated with a WikiProject). New Wikipedians are welcome.

Peer reviews are open to any feedback, and nominators may also request subject-specific feedback. Editors and nominators may both edit articles during the discussion. Compared to the real-world peer review process, where experts themselves take part in reviewing the work of another, the majority of the volunteers here, like most editors in Wikipedia, lack expertise in the subject at hand. This is a good thing—it can make technically-worded articles more accessible to the average reader. Those looking for expert input should consider contacting editors on the volunteers list, or contacting a relevant WikiProject.

To request a review, see the instructions page. Nominators are limited to one review at a time, and are encouraged to help reduce the backlog by commenting on other reviews. Any editor may comment on a review, and there is no requirement that any comment be acted on.

A list of all current peer reviews, with reviewers' comments included, can be found here. For easier navigation, a list of peer reviews, without the reviews themselves included, can be found here. A chronological peer reviews list can be found here.

Arts

User:AnomieBOT/C/Arts peer reviews

Everyday life

User:AnomieBOT/C/Everyday life peer reviews

Engineering and technology

User:AnomieBOT/C/Engineering and technology peer reviews

General

User:AnomieBOT/C/General peer reviews

Geography and places

User:AnomieBOT/C/Geography and places peer reviews

History

User:AnomieBOT/C/History peer reviews

Natural sciences and mathematics

User:AnomieBOT/C/Natural sciences and mathematics peer reviews

Language and literature

User:AnomieBOT/C/Language and literature peer reviews

Philosophy and religion

User:AnomieBOT/C/Philosophy and religion peer reviews

Social sciences and society

User:AnomieBOT/C/Social sciences and society peer reviews

Lists

User:AnomieBOT/C/List peer reviews

WikiProject peer-reviews


User:Dispenser/Checklinks/config